Criteria and SelectionThis is a featured page

Our students ARE different...

  • non-readers or almost readers

  • limited attention span

  • limited computer-as-tool experience

Criteria for Selecting Web 2.0 Resources, Activities and Tools:

Criteria and Selection - YoungLearners2.0

Curriculum-rich

practical, meaningful, purposeful experiences with curriculum topics, content or skill

Interface

simple, clean, uncluttered interface (few distractions)

Independence

requires limited user support after initial introduction, can be used independently

Reliability

site is not too slow to start, is USUALLY there, has few errors or "issues"

Thinking Required

Opportunities for higher-level thinking, discussion and learning ---

Bloom's Taxonomy

http://www.kurwongbss.eq.edu.au/thinking/Bloom/blooms.htm

http://www.apa.org/ed/new_blooms.html (activities and products)

http://www.techlearning.com/story/showArticle.php?articleID=196605124 (with digital tasks)

http://www.stfrancis.edu/assessment/BloomRevisedTaxonomy_KeyWords.pdf (verbs, ?s and more)

http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom%27s+Digital+Taxonomy (a great wiki on tech and Blooms)



No user avatar
glovely
Latest page update: made by glovely , Feb 4 2009, 11:49 PM EST (about this update About This Update glovely Edited by glovely

1 image added

view changes

- complete history)
Keyword tags: None
More Info: links to this page
There are no threads for this page.  Be the first to start a new thread.